Jump to content
Glade

Most secure OS?

Recommended Posts

"But if you look closely at the actual report (PDF), you'll see that this claim that Windows is "Most Secure" is based merely on Microsoft's relative speediness in patching security holes."

Quoted from:

http://www.tuaw.com/2007/03/22/fud-windows...most-secure-os/

I read that article and I'm not convinced that Windows is the most secure. Besides, how many people have Vista? The MacOSX system on the other hand, has updates that bring any Mac built in the last 8 years up to date with the lastest version as long as the user has purchased the major system upgrades such as Jaguar, Panther and Tiger, and they still run better than they ever did. (Limited of course, by processor speed and lack of newer features such as built-in cameras, remotes, updated optical drives, etc.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now let's rule out the article by pointing out that it's more than likely biased:

-------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[ Moved to Security forum ]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now let's rule out the article by pointing out that it's more than likely biased:

logo.gif

-------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[ Moved to Security forum ]

It could be considered biased, just because it is an Apple-related weblog, but the idea put forth in the article seems sound to me and is based on what the original study results showed. Besides, aren't PC sites just as biased?

Macs are still prettier n-n

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read about another study (on ZDNet) that looked at actual exploits rather than vulnerabilities, by that standard Mac OSX was the most secure. The experts were actually quite puzzled by the lack of exploits for it - while it's not as widely used as Windows, there are still a lot of systems out there using it. It has vulnerabilities, too - even though most of them are minor, you'd think somebody would be trying to take advantage of them. But apparently they're not, or they haven't been successful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greenknight, the biggest reason for that is that people want attention from viruses and other exploits. So how would you get the most attention, from writing a virus or exploit for an OS that is on an average of 95% of computers around the world (Windows) or one that is on about 5% or less (Macs). Obviously you'd go where it will be getting more attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exploits tend to be more profit-driven these days. No doubt if Mac's market share was bigger, someone would develop exploits for it, but that doesn't entirely explain the present total lack of exploits. Maybe the malware writers have bought into the Mac propaganda, and they just think it's too secure...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...